Man, I must be getting old, because more and more often something like this pops up and it strikes me that this has been done before.
In this case, I was flying through the file system like nobodies business in 1991 with Norton Commander[0]
In this case, I was flying through the file system like nobodies business in 1991 with Norton Commander[0]
A rope and pulley attached to a vertically-moving platform existed for a really long time, and then someone bolted on a ratchet, and it became an elevator, which (with some iteration, and marketing) gave birth to skyscrapers. Another one is LXC, which existed for 5 years before Docker's confluence of features (and impressive marketing) made it ubiquitous and changed the [backend] tech landscape.
From ~1990 to now (yikes, 30 years!), I've used these:
- Amiga: Directory Opus (DOpus)
- MSDOS: Norton Commander (NC)
- Windows: Total Commander
- Linux: Midnight Commander (mc)
- MacOS: Tux commander
Looking back at old Directory Opus screenshots tickles the nostalgic bone. I miss the colourcoded buttons.
I wonder if Directory Opus was the first 2-split navigator, but probably not.
In answer to your question of which was the first, the answer appears to be PathMinder (1984) and Norton Commander (1986). Both were for DOS so it seems to be an original innovation from the DOS world. Directory Opus first came out in 1990.
I wasn't familiar with PathMinder before looking at the wikipedia article but I was familiar with Norton Commander, as I think nearly everyone who used DOS in the late 80s would be. I personally favoured XTree (1985) more. Xtree didn't originally have the two pane view, but added it in 1989.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_manager#Orthodox_file_man...
Just as a data point, I tried that and I never could figure out how to populate the left pane and the right pane in such a way that it was helpful. (I.e. that copy and move did the right thing.) It just felt pointless to me.
I've used vifm a few times, but only after figuring out how to turn off the two-pane split :-)
De gustibus non disputandem, I guess.
https://books.google.nl/books?id=ki8EAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA34&redir_...
I love how "FORMAT your disk without leaving your spreadsheet" is a feature
Being able to format a floppy disc and continue to do things on OS/2 without applications becoming seriously jerky was also a feature. (-:
CentralPoint PC Tools seems little remembered nowadays. It was quite an extensive toolkit, as I recall. File viewers for various types of database/spreadsheet/wordprocessor files. Disc and file hex editors. Repair utilities. Extended directory change. A uniform look and feel, and a fairly good manual.
The Graham Utilities was another one.
* http://www.warpspeed.com.au/Products/OS2/GU/graham.htm
There seems to be no trace of things like InspectA (another OFM for OS/2) on the World Wide Web.
Indeed, up to the point that the name was usurped by some unrelated software.
It was very useful even in the later DOS era; it was a standard part of my travelling tech toolkit. It had one of the fastest floppy formatters around, and just about the fastest DOS disk-defragmenter I ever saw, nearly an order of magnitude quicker than Norton's.
The PC Tools backup/restore tool was also superb and extremely fast. It used an extended disk format, squeezing about 1.6 MB onto an HD 3½" floppy, and compressed data on the fly, so many megabytes of software or data could be squeezed onto the minimum number of floppies.
Benchmarks: http://www.oldskool.org/guides/dosbackupshootout
Unlike rival extended formats, if you tried to DIR the disk from DOS, you got a warning message: http://www.os2museum.com/wp/the-central-point-backup-floppy-...
What doomed Central Point software is that it did a licensing deal with Microsoft. Cut-down versions of PC Tools Backup and the separate Central Point Antivirus were bundled with MS-DOS 6. Microsoft promised CP that CP would make money from DOS 6 customers wishing to upgrade to the full versions.
In actual fact, people got by with the freebie versions and CP's sales of standalone products _and_ upgrades both stagnated.
MS tried similar tactics on STAC in the hope of bundling the Stacker disk-compression tool with MS-DOS 6. STAC, wisely, said no.
So Microsoft just stole the code and used it anyway.
STAC sued, won, and got $120M damages.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-02-24-fi-26671-...
It used the money wisely, to diversify the company out of disk compression by acquisition, buying vendors of remote-control software (ReachOut) and enterprise backup (Replica).
Sadly, this was long before ubiquitous Internet connectivity, even by dial-up modem. ReachOut mainly worked by direct-dial modem-to-modem comms -- useful, but expensive, as each machine to be controlled needs a modem, a telephone line and its own phone number.
It wasn't enough and STAC ended up going broke. Central Point Software was bought out by Symantec, like Quarterdeck and Norton and others.
MS-DOS 6 was badly buggy anyway and MS had to release a free update, MS-DOS 6.2. (Note, at this time, product updates, service packs, etc. were extremely rare.)
Then, when it lost the STAC lawsuit, it released another update, MS-DOS 6.21, which simply removed disk compression altogether.
Then MS rewrote the offending code and released MS-DOS 6.22, another free update, replacing the infringing "DoubleSpace" with "DriveSpace" -- basically the same tool but with different compression/decompression routines.
This was the last-ever version of MS-DOS, and thus DOS 6 has the dubious distinction of being the most-patched release in history.
There are details of this on Wikipedia but it's been sanitised by MS PR so it merely mentions patent infringement, rather than the direct code theft involved.
https://tedium.co/2018/09/04/disk-compression-stacker-double...
It was insanely good.
https://www.tecmint.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Worker-Fi...
Its available on FreeBSD so it must be available on Linux and macOS at least ... not sure about Windows.
It's (also) ActiveX (generic scriptig host, COM objects from/with scripts, etc.) scriptable and fully configurable. Just like in the good ole' days.
Idk what happened exactly, but now I can’t stand commanders at all.
I've used it as a replacement for Total Commander on the Mac. Another posted posted Marta, which I just downloaded and it seems to have almost the same features as Total Commander but in a free/open source offering.
Forklift made some questionable choices in the version 3. The app became much slower.
To install - brew install nnn
The two-pane file browser (folder tree plus folder contents like Windows 95 Explorer, or two parallel panes like Norton Commander) was a compromise solution that has worked for decades.
But this idea of showing in context a limited view of representative items of each collection could be generalized and exploited in other generic data-heavy interfaces, where there's no business code to show the specific data loads in the best way.
I don't think there is a standard widget other than what's implemented by each solution. Broot is one way of looking at a volume at the expense of lots of disk reads (for every file on the volume). Ranger does that at a single depth and that's a design choice in Miller's view. nnn doesn't prefer to read within directories unless explicitly requested and that's a design choice too. There's nothing good or bad about these other than a choice to the user to pick the one that fits his use case.
A user always has the liberty to concentrate only on the current directory, just know where he is in the filesystem from the file path and do a fuzzy search to find a file deep in the subtree when he needs to do so. As you might have noticed, even with Broot there's no simple way to list the files marked "unlisted" without navigating to the dir and expanding it. It's a nice program and is a solution to people who likes to see a snapshot of the filesystem in a glance. But would everyone be always interested in the contents of /etc, /run, /usr and /var as shown in one of the sample images?
There are ways to avoid traversing the whole volume in each use, namely caching each directory content when it's updated.
As for always showing unwanted information, an interactive solution could allow an option to "fold and hide" specific folders so that their contents are not shown until the user specifically reopens them. A user-friendly interactive solution doesn't require the user to remember and choose among all the available choices for each use, it provides good defaults and reminders on how to access alternative options when those are needed.
I've also used Total Commander for a while. I haven't seen any directory or file manager that is better.
Far Manager is better, of course :)