The problem with this, in the UK at least, is that banks do call and ask for personal info such as date of birth, etc. The irony always seems lost on them when you refuse to give it.
The problem with this, in the UK at least, is that banks do call and ask for personal info such as date of birth, etc. The irony always seems lost on them when you refuse to give it.
They immediately understood, gave me a reference number, and told me to get my credit card and call the number on the back and give the reference number.
When I called back I was able to pick up right where I left off.
On one hand I was impressed that they had this flow, but on the other hand I was disappointed that they were training people that it's ok to give personal information on the phone.
I had another bank do what I thought was the right thing. I got a recorded call that said, "We believe someone used your card to make a gas purchase in Las Vegas. We have locked your card. If this was you, please call the number on the back of your card, press 3, and an operator will be able to unlock your card. Or you can log in with the app and unlock the card yourself."
They did all the right things. They told me unique information that helped identify they weren't a scammer but didn't reveal anything too personal, and then told me how to securely contact them.
Don't know if that scam still works, or not, and the same flow is probably used by legitimate senders.
I've tried to explain to them several times that they are training their customers to fall or scams, but they seem to be unable to comprehend.
My pension provider, Scottish Widows, did this to me a few weeks back, from a private number to boot.
I told them I'd call them back and they were fine. Not sure if it was a scam or not but suspect not as they were pretty ok about the whole thing.
That said, the "call back" test is an easy smell test -- a bad actor will have a huge problem with that, while the bank usually won't think too much of it.
Thankfully I don't share passwords across accounts, so only had to update that one!
I mention it because (and this is I think a good contribution to the thread) "getting upset" correlates strongly with "hiding something" and with "axe to grind with the world" and with "not disciplined or patient enough to get a job."
Honestly I think I'd rather had have it be a scam, at that point :/
It doesn't need to be a very good password, because it's not as though it can be brute forced. It's like the Socialist Millionaire's Protocol situation, a human is in the loop, if you get the answer wrong twice the human is already very annoyed, so you cannot try 100 passwords let alone a billion.
Although they still try to ask for your DOB first, which means you can't have a blanket "If someone calls from your bank and asks for your DOB, they are definitely fraudsters" rule.
Note that fraudsters are doing things like faking caller ID and holding the line open, playing dialling tone on landline calls so that you hang up, think you are dialling again, and actually are still on the original call. The fix there is to use your mobile to call them back, or call someone else first. You can also feed them wrong information and see how they react, but I'd still do the call back thing.
Its quite disconcerting, especially as most corporate VOIP extends to mobiles.
If it's a landline, call on a mobile.