This also means that the attractive people will find they'll get matched up with nothing but uggos, and then they'll leave.
This also means that the attractive people will find they'll get matched up with nothing but uggos, and then they'll leave.
There are people whose aesthetic appeal is quite broad. There are people whose aesthetic appeal is narrower. There are relatively few people who are broadly aesthetically repulsive. No one should deny that the former end of things makes a lot of activities easier, including dating... but the funny thing in talking to my acquaintances from the very attractive to narrower-appeal segment is that nobody seems to find it easy.
It’s almost as if what people are looking for isn’t as easy as negotiating aesthetics.
Politically correct speech pays a heavy price in expressiveness, especially of the banned ideas. It is kind of the point. What did I save up the points for, if not to spend it to say what I actually want, rather than gesture at it ineffectively?
“unattractive” a word you yourself already used. If you read the guidelines of the site, you’d understand the difference and why it’s important.
Yikes. Gotta hope you're physically attractive, 'cause your attitude is extremely not. My cynical take, as a divorcée, is that folks who've been married before will be less interested in the superficial and better equipped to evaluate compatibility. Folks drawn to this site will probably be less interested in the looks of their intended, and perhaps their own appearance as well. And they'll be all the happier if you keep to the shallows.