No, every week one of his algorithm descriptions gets to the front page, and now he's finished posting those and this is the summary. I don't see anything wrong with that; do you?
Its funny how that works. Since I would consider myself a pretty regular reader and haven't seen this yet.
I only saw a few of them. And what's wrong with maze algorithms?
I want to see 3D maze algorithms next!
Nearly all of the algorithms I described extend well into multiple dimensions. I'm not sure how Eller's would work in 3D, but there is probably a way. And the Binary Tree and Sidewinder algorithms seem like they ought to be possible to adapt to 3D, but I don't immediately see how. The others, though, are all trivially expandable to n-dimensions (just add "up", "down" and any other directions you like to the list of possible moves).