> liberal New York politics
I would:
a) imagine something called the NY times to be somewhat skewed to NY.
b) It’s only liberal in America. In any other first world country, it’s right wing.
I would:
a) imagine something called the NY times to be somewhat skewed to NY.
b) It’s only liberal in America. In any other first world country, it’s right wing.
That's not the reputation they sell when they call themselves the "Newspaper of Record"[1]. They also cultivate themselves as internationalists. They do not represent themselves ala NY Post (i.e. "hizzoner")
On acceptance of immigrants and race the US is generally to the left of Europe. The notion of an official language is common in Europe and decried as racist in the US. The US was earlier in deploying laws against employment discrimination, and affirmative action than Europe. (France in particular categorically bans affirmative action.) Things like bans on Islamic head coverings are routine and widely supported in Europe, but are beyond the wildest dreams even if Bannon and Trump.
In abortion, the US falls behind because it doesn’t have universal healthcare. But most states permit abortion much further into the pregnancy than almost anywhere in Europe. (Sweden at 18 weeks is on the high end. Many countries are at 12 weeks. The current statutory limit in Georgia is 22 weeks (a federal judge has blocked the 6 week heartbeat law).
There are some social issues where the US remains conservative like attitudes toward nudity and sex as well as religiosity and church attendance and child punishment. There are more displays of nationalism like school children daily saying the pledge etc. More significant issues include the death penalty and mass incarceration. But in fiscal issues, the US is much more conservatives. Even the party on the "left" houses Bloomberg, Bezos and Soros.
Consumer protection is unimaginably weak by European standards as are protections for employees. All the "liberal" media outlets have a center-right market focus. The WSJ is well to the right of Bloomberg Media and the Economist which themselves are firmly free market. Calls for nationalization of industries that Europeans long ago switched to non-profit are unheard of in the States.
Even universal healthcare, which is universally supported by European parties and much of the third world is a non-starter for Republicans and under endless debate by Democrats. Government sponsored housing is no longer even discussed and structures are even demolished. Likewise support for adequate pensions as well as food and housing for the indigent: "Welfare reform" which was a reduction in the social safety net, was embraced by B Clinton who is considered by many in the US to be an extreme liberal.
I’d say that the US is to the right of most of Europe when it comes to free markets at the national level, but to the left at the state and local level. The US has no appetite for experimenting with markets for big ticket public services and utilities. The US has among the highest percentage of K-12 education being in public schools in the whole OECD. School vouchers are common in Europe. Many European cities have privately operated subway systems. No major US city does.
Not really. The opposite has been true for almost four years.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recognition_of_same-sex_unio...
In 2019, that’s probably not true. For example, the New York Times is championing Medicare for All, while many European systems rely on multiple private insurers. The New York Times is generally hostile to school choice, especially government funding of religious schools, which is common in Europe. American politics, and the New York Times specifically, is substantially to the left of Europe on cultural and immigration issues. Bans on Islamic head coverings, for example, are widespread in Europe, enjoying 80%+ support in counties like France. But the New York Times has been very critical of such things. In another example, French views of the propriety of a country having an official language would be very right-wing to the New York Times editorial staff. The EU is more pro-competition and pro-markets than the New York Times. For example, private operation of the subway in many European cities like Stockholm. The New York Times views many issues, such as broadband, through a liberal social justice lens, which is simply missing in European politics.