https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/irs-budg...
> IRS Research Division estimates in the 2003 GAO report, however, placed returns for activities such as tax enforcement at more than ten – and in some cases more than 20 – dollars collected for every dollar spent. Phone calls to follow up on tax debts owed were estimated to return 13 dollars for every dollar spent. Audits by mail returned as much as 11 dollars for every dollar spent. Using the overall rate of a four to one return, this year’s $100 million budget cut translates to a $400 million loss.
Imagine 20 dollars per dollar spent, that's the type of unicorn investment that basically every VC hunts for.
Obviously we can afford to diminish a 20.0 BCA and still make tons of money, but I wonder what the actual limit of this would be.
1) The fiscal conservatives should argue that as long as revenues increase more than expenses (better than 1:1), we should increase funding to the IRS. After that, the expense outweighs the direct reward.
2) There's a huge moral hazard when we don't enforce tax laws. People become more emboldened to cheat on taxes. Increased funding should also rein in future frauds. So even if you spend $2 to collect $1, if that deters future fraud it is possibly worth more than the $2 spent
That likely cost the IRS a comparable, if not greater, amount of hours. Increasing the funding is not beneficial when it results in more audits like mine.