I don't deny that. But to consciously serve as an advocate/mouthpiece knowing it's a evil mess, for the sake of one's Googliness (the joy of the happy, well rewarded elite family)?
I'd venture to bet a lot of these folks wouldn't be willing to look the other way for $50k a year.
But if people had to be paid more for doing good, on average, that would mean most people preferred doing bad things! Which would be bad and mean most people would be evil.
Doing the right thing being costly isn't a thing that just happens to be true of our imperfect society, it's an unavoidable logical consequence of distinguishing between "right" and "profitable".
Convince me I'm wrong.