Honest question. Should we have banned research in nuclear science because it gave us the bomb? Is social science with two sided implications any different? I feel like the only difference here is that the layman is more likely to understand the implications of misuse of such research, which creates a far stronger social pressure than there was associated with nuclear science in the 40s-50s. But this cat is already out of its bag, and this is research that IMO needs to be done because there are enormous positive consequences for e.g. disease management, human enhancement, and social policy driven by a more complete picture of the origins of human behavior.