HAVING COUNT(*) > 2;
I'll take 9% );
I'll take 9% );
Back to 10%
>Other double payments made by mistake included times that the state received multiple invoices.
I would assume each paid invoice was a new transaction ID. The real problem seems like there are two invoices being paid. Not that there are two transactions (which seems like just a symptom). It's possible that each invoice even has it's own ID.
8%?