Hacker News Reader

That's nice. I'm not sure exactly what you think is happening here, but "make up a bunch of stuff and use it to pursue a whistleblower claim" doesn't strike me as a very appealing or sound strategy for ill-gotten gains. This isn't something that gets litigated in backroom discussions or tabloid news outlets.

View on HN

Have you ever been in a courtroom? Not a lot of neutral statements of unvarnished truth pass back and forth there. Some do, but not many. I am extraordinarily worried about the precedent of paying witnesses for their testimony, which is what this amounts to. However good we think that our reasons may be.

Expert witnesses get paid for their testimony all the time.

Expert witnesses are paid by the hour, and still get paid whether the case is won or lost. The abuses of honesty in the expert witnesses system are still horrific enough.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com