There's the dot-org self-dealing fraud / corruption, with a compilation by dang (and others) of HN submissions here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21668003
Brian Krebs on obtaining a .gov domain:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21644857
Susam's "Sinkholed" story of having a domain appropriated by Shadowserver:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21700139
And a set of searches for lost, stolen, or hijacked domains:
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
"How we nearly lost our domain, and how to prevent this"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19322966
Kissmetrics has either sold or lost control of their domain, with no warning
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17416996
"Ask HN: Host Gator Hijacked my domain name. What should I do?"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4968233
"Domain Hijacking with a Fax"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6535904
"How to get a stolen domain back?"
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3873004
... and many more.
I'd posted a thread to Mastodon a week or so back asking if we're simply doing DNS wrong for the current era. Though getting it right would be a challenge.
https://mastodon.cloud/@dredmorbius/103184864263833546
Revisiting the foundations (see the LivingInternet link in my earlier comment) might be useful. Not because they're correct, necessarily, but to examine them for flawed or no-longer-valid presumptions.