These max overload wing tests are scary dangerous, but they don't represent real flight situations. 99% of their target safety factor is within the margin of error for manufacturing variance.
While they'll most certainly investigate the causes of the damage down the fuselage from the wing rupture, it's not likely much of it will be unexpected - if a plane experienced that load, the plane is considered a Loss of Hull even if it lands successfully somehow.
I'm immensely paranoid about flying on planes, I have a terrible fear of heights... and nothing I've read in that article bothers me in the slightest.
The ring pull on a can might be a better example. Tear-strips are notoriously unpredictable.
The whole thing is pretty ingenious, but the way the internal pressure helps vent the can while the tab is acting as a second class lever, then as soon as it’s vented becomes a first class lever to push the scored section of the top into the can — that’s great engineering.
About that…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwest_Airlines_Flight_1380