> ...what I do see are people being encouraged to graduate at the top of their class so they can get jobs at highly profitable FAANG companies.
This has been true for India for a long time but the trend has been reversing since 2014 with the explosion of VC and in particular Angel investments that followed the Indian unicorn boom. Surprised that Europe is on a different trajectory.
> Also, it feels like the VCs are the one taking the majority of the damage this time, not retail investors.
Are majority investors who would have usually invested in the public markets now channeling capital to growth stage funds or are they calling bluff when these unicorns do float IPOs? If the former, not really sure if it's bad or good and for whom, but kind of makes for a very different proposition to the dot-com bubble of 2000s.
For instance, just today, paytm which long lost its market leader position in B2C/ P2P payments in India to Walmart's PhonePe, GooglePay, and WhatsApp, announced $1 billion in Series G funding that takes the total to $4.3 billion raised so far [0] with $500 million in losses just this past year. I really fail to understand the economics behind growth stage fund at all if it is clear that public markets aren't going to bail these investors out if the companies aren't making profits to justify valuation. Google India has openly complained abt the current P2P/B2C payments market as a loss leader with no path forward on generating revenue.
Either that, or like patio11 says, the amt of capital flowing through the markets is astounding [1]; and so I wonder if I am missing some key insights to be able to grasp the economics of it all, as an outsider?
[0] https://techcrunch.com/2019/11/24/paytm-1-billion/
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19210703