Climate science is not something you can philosophize away. There are no arguments.

There used to be more pessimistic models that predicted some linear progression of current warming. So the new mainstream models fit measurements better, mainly because more scientific resources were thrown at the problem. They also predict slower change.

Magnetic fields, shifting magnetic poles, gravity, shifting orbits, solar intensity were all considered, by thousands of scientists writing thousands of papers. If you have something to add then do your own science. Arguments without math, data, models, simulations won't be taken seriously. Extraordinary claims require more evidence.

There might be group think, too many people working on the problem, etc.. but you can't discredit the findings with that argument.