Isn't it ? I mean, I don't respect China much but this is not a false statement.
Obviously if you define "Western media" as newspapers providing a certain viewpoint then by definition your argument would be correct. But that isn't an interesting argument.
Moreover, using the Internet people in the US can read diverse points of view, including e.g. those of pro-China websites. This is not possible in China, except for a small minority who have access to VPN and similar technology.
The majority of American News can be traced back to 6 billionaires
http://www.tiragraffi.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/thebig6....
6 is more than one. A majority is not a totality. And not all Western media is American.
I want Beijing to have universal suffrage just as much as I want the Cantonese to.
At least SCMP still gives a truthful view: https://yp.scmp.com/hongkongprotests5demands
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsWa9fieWSU
This interview was in Melbourne, Australia. Many of the interviewees were mainland students in Australia.
Not saying your associates and colleagues must be like one of them. Just offering one possible explanation.
You can also test their knowledge, by asking them about the Five Demands of Hong Kong protestors, and also Hong Kong legislative and government structures. Some of the answers can be found in the original article.
Props to China though for having a pretty effective system.