Unless it means that those attacks that the intelligence community prevented will take place.
Congressional oversight is a mild annoyance to them at best, and the CIA has been caught lying to them before. No reason to trust they are working in our interests except "I believe the propaganda" and wishful thinking.
Will continue to care about more about feeding their family.
There is no connection between being victim and becoming a terrorist or we in Italy should be all terrorists, because in the 70s a lot of people have been killed by state terrorists.
Lookup Giorgiana Masi, for example, or Stefano Cucchi.
Their families didn't kill anybody.
They just asked for justice.
Vengeance has never been a pathway to justice, kamikazes go to die because their families are compensated or because their families are threatened or because they are radicalized in other ways, there's no connection between bombings and suicide bombers, in fact you don't see fathers or mothers do it, you see young males do it (85% of all suicide bombers are man).
Radical organizations use bombers as weapons, they need them to be reliable (as reliable as possible) you can't just count on the momentary lapse of reason that could bring a father to hope to kill his son's killers.
Hamas, for example, was against using women as suicide bombers, but in 2004 they changed idea, after the first woman was used, they said “this is a significant evolution in our fight. The male fighters face many obstacles... Women are like the reserve army―when there is a necessity, we use them.” [1]
[1] https://ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pdffiles/PUB408.pdf [PDF]
Then I would consider the possibility that they were framing you.
I confess I don't know, but I imagine that if you make some mistake while working for agencies like CIA or MI5 or KGB you simply disappear, you die if you're lucky, or something worse happens to you.
> They can murder as many innocent people as they want without having to prove their usefulness.
I seriously don't think it works like that...
Point of reference, TSA has a 90% failure rate on tests of their performance while consuming vast amounts of money and inconveniencing every traveler. Does the public have any good reason to believe the CIA is more effective than the TSA?
Is there any reason to believe the CIA does more good than harm?
I assume they do it because they hate American freedom.
The freedom of the people to chose their own representatives and leaders, something U.S. agency CIA has tempered with many times, especially in South America.
> I assume they do it because they hate American freedom.
Or is the CIA that hates other countries freedom to not agree with them?
Maybe other countries created their agencies to defend them from CIA.
There are always two sides in a story.