Let me correct that: Mr Assange’s health has been seriously affected by the environment that he exposed himself to
(Edit: I’m talking about the embassy episode here, not his more recent incarceration)
Let me correct that: Mr Assange’s health has been seriously affected by the environment that he exposed himself to
(Edit: I’m talking about the embassy episode here, not his more recent incarceration)
What lies about extradition? Just as they forced him out of the embassy the US published an extradition request. There were also past cases such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repatriation_of_Ahmed_Agiza_an...
He was right. His opinions on extradition were proven correct.
How can you ignore the literal evidence, right here, right now, of everything that he had predicted, to be coming true?
Even if he hadn't lied in claims re: extradition, the current extradition is for credible and serious charges and he should face justice.
I am saying, that no matter what happened, whether there was a secret order, or not, or whether an extradition order would have been sent, the moment he stepped out of the embassy (but otherwise did not "exist" prior to him stepping out of the embassy), what was going to happen is that he was going to be extradited to the USA.
And this prediction was proven correct. And the people who disagreed with this idea, owe the world an apology, for being entirely, completely, 100% wrong.
If you disagree, you are basically holding an unfalsifiable position. Because by doing so, you are saying that no matter if he actually gets extradite, like what just happened!, you are going to ignore the actual evidence of this prediction coming true!
It seems like there is no possible evidence or situation that I could show you, which would change your mind, because your argument is always going to be "Well, the order didn't exist before... but it does now".
I can't argue with this kind of unfalsifiable position.
If someone had predicted "this person is going to be extradited to the USA, at some point in the future", then this person was correct, and if you disagree with this person, and called them a conspiracy theorist, then you were wrong.
The position that there never was a sealed extradition request can be falsified with evidence of one, it's just that there currently is no evidence.
Would you imagine that what we are observing right now, would be any different than this hypothetical universe where a secret extradition order did indeed exist?
Is it really so hard to believe that such a hypothetical universe would almost certainly look exactly like the universe that we are in right now?
Fuck you.
Did you miss what happened to him when he was arrested? He's now being tortured even more. He put himself there, for his safety, and to think he did it 'just because' is wildly ridiculous.
Sweden's actual extradition agreement is much more limited than Assange claimed. The UK's is much friendlier to the UK, so if he was honestly worried about extradition his behavior was strange and is more plausibly explained by him trying to cover up his rape. His account was mostly false and deeply misleading about what Sweden did and did not extradite for, which would make sense if it was just a pretext. I believe he tried to dodge real and credible charges in Sweden, and all of his behavior, esp the narcissistic levels of dishonesty point to a rapist who was caught and got trapped by their lies.