> I cant imagine a logical thought process you could have gone through to conclude some people that you carve out would actually want less information

I said the insurance companies would receive more information, and that would prevent those underinsured from being able to negotiate, lest the insurance companies find out. I don't understand how you could interpret it the way you did... And then you ironically question my ability to be logical, hoo boy!

And what does your link on the job market have to do with this?