Saying that candidate A retains quality X is as good as the tests administored to measure and quantify the presence of said quantity.

In politics, there exists a game with real stakes to LOOK a certain way regardless of the truth.

Therefore, I find that any opinion on political matters made as if it were a matter of fact has a high probability of being either naive or a component of a political campaign to influence public opinion on said candidate.

So I ask this question of you, what are the tests administered to verify you claim of Warren and what is your profession? Are you an expert in policy?