Edit: naturally, the hackernews crowd ignores actual science which clearly demonstrates fire could not have been the cause: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Downvote away, losers.
Edit: naturally, the hackernews crowd ignores actual science which clearly demonstrates fire could not have been the cause: http://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Downvote away, losers.
The science in the link is interesting, but note how it does not talk about why it happened that way. So it is disingenuous to say that the science says the government did it. Furthermore while these scientists believe that it was a simultaneous failure of all supporting columns there are others that think differently.
I find it fascinating that there is so much disagreement on the subject, and that how difficult is to reconstruct an event of such magnitude.
EDIT: small fires at ground level have caused perfect symmetric demolitions of many skyscrapers since WTC7. This is why small fires are now the preferred method of demolition.