Hacker News Reader

It does mention rg which is in the same category as ag and, maybe this is my own bias, seems to have more mindshare now.

Agreed - I used to use Ag but switched to Ripgrep. Better in every single way, in my opinion. It's obscenely fast and has good defaults

I find the to be faster than ag personally

On a simple case, `time rg ^:debug ~/projects`, `ag` appears to be about 10% faster for me, which is negligible for most cases anyway.

Maybe rg is faster on more complex cases?

Can you reproduce it in a public corpus and file a bug report? ripgrep should never be slower than ag.

ripgrep >> ag

and skim is a rust clone of fzf