Hacker News Reader

Comment by chrisseaton | Hacker News Reader

> how to "accumulate" potential energy if you don't have batteries/capacitors

That's what the compressed gas is - it's potential energy. It's like a battery.

> Like how I can't fill my car tire with my bike pump.

Why not? Because you can't pump hard enough and it's not strong enough to hold the pressure needed? You can build a stronger pump, and you can use a lever or gears (same thing really) to compensate for your strength if you can't pump any more.

> Presumably you could fill the tire of a transport truck with the bulb from a blood pressure cuff and a lot of time, but it's not intuitive to me what the mechanics are in between those two things.

Again that's just a 'lever' problem - you can't squeeze the bulb hard enough, so add a lever (and you may need to make the bulb stronger.)

View on HN

I personally understand these things. I'm trying (and failing) to communicate that mechanics can be less intuitive than electricity. I regret this post. :)

Interesting question though. I wonder if the answer is more trivial than "mechanics is harder than electricity", perhaps the people you're explaining to don't understand electricity either. If someone is trying to understand "how does air move in only one direction in a compressor", perhaps they also don't understand "how does the electricity move in only one direction in the generator"? Could they explain why the pressure coming from the compressed air canister doesn't cause the electricity generator to run backwards?

You might be alluding to this, but I wonder if people are more prepared to mentally conceptualize electricity as a magic atomic constant: "it just works that way... so given that, of course a huge generator can produce enough power to run a large pump."

Pressure differential is analogous to voltage and mass flow to current, I think we are all on the same page about that.

The sorely missing bit is the equivalent of those amazing DC/DC step-up/down voltage regulators that have revolutionized the application of electricity in recent decades (all the way from tiny electronics to massive HVDC networks), and/or an equivalent of the AC transformers that fulfilled a similar role before. Actually AC is missing in its entirety, there's just no practical way of transmitting power via soundwaves.

The closest pneumatic equivalent to DC-DC converters are coupled turbines, e.g. turbochargers or high bypass turbojets. But those are not just far beyond households appliance scale, they are also limited to the high mass-flow/low pressure differential, but practical applications of pneumatic storage are the opposite.

> DC/DC step-up/down voltage regulators

Interestingly, there is actually a hydraulic mechanism that's the equivalent of a boost converter with inductor, diode, and switching element:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_ram

It translates a low-pressure fluid with continuous flow into periodic high-pressure impulses. The inertia of the fluid is the hydraulic equivalent of the inductor, and a switching element (valve) closing suddenly causes a spike in pressure as the water decelerates suddenly, equivalent to a voltage spike as an inductor "wants to keep the current flowing".

But it usually operates with water, which has much higher density (hence inertia) than air, so it might not be very efficient (or might require much higher flow rate) in a pneumatic version.

You add a gear to your compressor. There is no need for an air pressure converter (which is effectively just an compressed air powered compressor with a higher maximum pressure).

Substituting pressure with more volume is highly impractical when storage is involved.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com