Conversely, what boxes would you say are missing?
Conversely, what boxes would you say are missing?
Do you see a site isolation checkbox there btw? Missing one of the most important exploit mitigation technologies for browsers today strongly suggests that whoever made this list was either incompetent or deliberately picking boxes that firefox ticks.
I'd assume that instead of having actual browser security experts build this list they had some amateurs attempt to build a list of existing security "features" in browsers, which isn't a sane approach at all and is bound to get results like this. A good checklist would almost certainly have lots of boxes nobody ticks.
Automatic updates also tend to leak information by design.
But anyway, this has nothing to do with my larger point. A good checklist would certainly have lots of boxes nobody ticks, this one was clearly built around firefox feature lists (and maybe others, but not chrome as site isolation is left out).