I don't know, it's just very ugly and it lacks a sense of aesthetics (just like everything else on macos, so at least it is consistent).
It's like reading a book that uses three different fonts on each page. You just cannot take it seriously.
It's like reading a book that uses three different fonts on each page. You just cannot take it seriously.
MacOS is one of the few registered UNIX systems out there (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification#macO...).
I actually do not own a Mac, but it is a decent OS and performs well and tries to be windows friendly (hence camelcase and spaces) and tries to be stable and secure.
cool way to bloat your glyph set to double the size and introduce aesthetic and string matching problems.
In terms of your general point, upper and lower case letters were originally different stylistic type-faces rather than "modes" of a letter in the same type-face. It wasn't until relatively recently in our writing history that the rules of capital letters became defined rather than a style choice and I'm certain they weren't thinking much about the problems that might cause with string matching on digital systems invented several hundred years later.