> If there was no chemistry prize and Dow Chemical or Bayer stepped in to create one, it wouldn't be anywhere as respected as the actual Chemistry Nobel, would it?
The Nobel Prize was created by the owner of a Swedish chemical and weapons company. I don't see what's so great about it.
And as for the Swedish Central Bank, I think Paul Krugman hit the nail on the head: Oh, and cue the usual complaints that this isn’t a “real” Nobel. Hey, this is just a prize given by a bunch of Swedes, as opposed to the other prizes, which are given out by, um, bunches of Swedes.
Which is very unfortunate, because like medicine, the practice of economics has the power to influence decisions and affect lives.
So will the Economics Nobel be legitimate when it turns 100 then?
The official Nobel site lists the Economics prize:
* https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/
What other authority on the matter is there than the actual organization itself?