> Are these things true of Chicago & Austin as well, or is the the common misconception that "non-coastal" regions means "rural"?
Chicago is on the longest contiguous coastline in the US; it isn't rural, it's also not non-coastal.
Chicago is on the longest contiguous coastline in the US; it isn't rural, it's also not non-coastal.
But that's not the grouping of cities commonly referred to as being "coastal." I obviously know that non-coastal != rural, but that equivalence is frequently used in American discourse. See also: "flyover country", etc.