> and so we named it RISC-V. As one of our goals in defining RISC-V was to support research in data-parallel architectures, the Roman numeral ‘V’ also conveniently served as an acronymic pun for “Vector.”
[1] https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~krste/papers/EECS-2016-1.p...
———-
so maybe in a way “vee” isn’t so inappropriate after all ^_^
Not to mention the "Plus" vs "Max" and all the other naming convention mismatches.
Anyway, I agree with you.
I also say "macosix" and "windos" (and used to say "solarix") as generic alternatives to commercial trademarks.
Marketing departments can only propose pronunciation, they cannot dictate it, and they have no right or power to prevent inventing synonyms for the trademarks they control. They also have no authority over verbs, so e.g. "googling" is a generic term right out of the gate.
There won't be a RISC-VI, so it doesn't matter that it means "5" to some people.