But Uber was the first to successfully deliver taxi via app, which did actually transform the world.
Nowadays, almost every taxi company has an app, which emulates all the same functionality as Uber. Uber’s way of changing the world was one of user experience and logistics. Not the actual transportation, which as you call out, existed long before.
I'd say no. The cab industry was already tracking vehicle GPS circa 2005: http://www.taxi-library.org/mccurdy.htm
Google Maps Android launched in 2008. It doesn't take a genius to say, "What if..." And people did. Like this 2010 paper about experiments with Java apps to do taxi dispatch in Singapore: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/dddc/21e65523932240164d2bb4...
So people are giving Uber credit for something that would have happened anyhow. And they're doing that because Kalanick was the one most willing to burn money and break laws, not because he was such a creative genius.
Uber can meet demand since they don't own the cars nor the staff. The system automatically scales, something taxis can't do.
That is the innovation, not apps. Plenty of taxi companies all over the world had apps before Uber even existed.
Now I can get an Uber almost anywhere.
In 2012 there where 233,900 cabs in the US which seems limited, but they would work very long hours. Uber’s actual change was mostly around increasing peak availability, but not nessisarily total availability as 1/2 of their drivers average 1 to 15 hours each week.
If that's getting done for SC (a relatively un-dense state) I think they're covering pretty much everywhere in the US.
TBH I think the page you linked to is more about SEO than about Uber's actual coverage.
Can you tell me a specific place that has good coverage from cabs where Uber doesn't operate?
Think smaller, Charles town WV official population 5,957 has taxi service. Edit: that was under the Baltimore map even though DC was closer. https://www.uber.com/global/en/cities/baltimore/
I also think they'll get the the Charles Town WVs of the world at some point.