Please disclaim when you are linking material that has a religious bent. Both of these books appear to be based upon the Christian belief system and as such might not be of any interest to someone with a different (or nonexistent) belief system.
I likewise would recommend reading "Islamic Patterns: An analytical and cosmological approach" when approaching geometry.
Either the book is good or not in getting you to understand something you don't currently understand. I trust the reader to be able to make their own judgements, especially in this case where you can read the book for the opposite gender to see if they are full of bullshit.
>This article seem to be written by an ideologically inclined woman.
If you are calling out someone as being ideological and then recommending books that are based in a religious ideology, it seems relevant to make note of it.
In my opinion learning how to be adaptive in personal relationships and not pushing narratives onto the other is the most productive approach.
This is why I don’t think the two are similar in nature, although I think it’s great you brought it up so that everyone can judge for themselves with as much info as possible upfront.
People have been making this sort of stuff since way before LSD was invented, but I can't help notice how incredibly similar the patterns are to psychedelic hallucinations. To see them described as "sacred geometries" makes a lot of sense for reasons I can't quite explain.
I recommend the podcast The Portal by Eric Weinstein if you want the idea equivalent of this stuff.
Most religions have ideas about relationships that are not informed by anything secular, and Christianity certainly does.
Opening a preview of the book I was quickly able to find lines like these:
"If we are willing to be molded by His hands, the Lord will shower us, our men, and our relationships with abundance. That is the way He works. He made us for each other. He is the Author of love"
"I feel like the Lord has blessed my desire to serve my husband and our marriage by giving me a permanent internal motivation to have a healthy "temple." And I know He will do the same for you"
So no, this is not the association fallacy. This is asking people to disclaim when the advice they are giving has a significant religious component.