I've read this[1] yesterday on a complete unrelated topic, and I must say that "I don't buy" it's another form of not understanding statistics.
Biology is what it is and controls major aspects of our lives.
If you can be stronger of some of the biological instincts, good, but statistically biology always wins.
We can say for example that "women prefer laudanum, men prefer opium and pronstitues" is 100% a social construction.
"Women are better at social activities while men are better at competitive activities" much less so.
> Like most psychologists who study personality, Peterson believes there are five core personality traits—extraversion, agreeableness, openness, conscientiousness and neuroticism—and that these traits are universal across most cultures. The taxonomy is also gendered. For example, women tend to be more agreeable than men. The traits have both biological and cultural origins and, as Peterson is fond of saying, the biological factors maximize in places—like Scandinavia—that have strenuously tried to flatten out the cultural differences. Biology is, therefore, in a sense, destiny, no matter how much people may want to deny it. To his mind, arguing that gender is a social construct or a kind of performance or—as the Ontario Human Rights Code says—an individual’s subjective experience is just wrong. “It’s not an alternative hypothesis,” Peterson says. “It’s an incorrect hypothesis.
-- Jordan Bernt Peterson is a Canadian clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto.
[1] https://torontolife.com/city/u-t-professor-sparked-vicious-b...