Defending statutory rape, even hypothetically, will get you fired.
It's not a crucifixion.
IIRC Stallman did nothing of the sort. The only thing Stallman said was that the accusations correspond to statutory rape.
In fact how is Stallman supposed to have defended statutory rape if he was the one raising the accusation of statutory rape? Some random virtue signaler started making up accusations of sexual assault and Stallman chimed in stating that the description actually represented the crime of statutory rape. How is that passed off as a defense or apology?
So now you've crucified an innocent man, for offering a defense of his friend, who may also be innocent of what he's accused of, when what he's accused of may not even be criminal.
Really saving the world there.
"That the age of consent is 16 or less in most of Europe but 18 in some US states gives rise to some dissonance when discussions arise about the attractiveness and availability of 16- and 17-year-olds. 16 is actually common in the US (30 states out of 50), but not many seem to realize this- probably because it's 18 in California, where a lot of the US entertainment industry is based."
Tech industry is also based in California. This is a California morality issue not an American morality issue, there's no US wide agreement on what is an acceptable age of consent.
Maybe the other Americans are right on this one?
This does not sound impossible to me. Is the idea that say a 19 year old prostitute having sex with an 80 year old man so foreign to you?