What is the news here? Earning billions from owning and operating a business is not a crime.
What is the news here? Earning billions from owning and operating a business is not a crime.
> ... suggesting that the family tried to shield wealth as it faced a raft of litigation over its role in the opioid crisis.
If you are not aware of the reporting on Purdue and how they directly contributed to the opioid crisis, start with this fantastic exposé from the Los Angeles Times: https://www.latimes.com/projects/oxycontin-part1/
Nobody addicted to opium was “tricked” into it. All legal opium is prescribed by a licensed doctor for godsakes!
Fining them isn’t helping people with opiate addiction. If we were to bankrupt the Sackler family tomorrow nobody addicted to opium is magically going to kick the habit.
Highly addictive drugs aren't a thing you just start and stop taking... Opioids are intensely addictive and Purdue repeatedly marketed Oxycotin as a non-addictive Opioid, there is even video of a Sackler talking about how much the sales team should be pushing the non-addictive qualities[1] as a benefit when dealing with Doctors. They also used the ye olde drug rep hard sell sales tactics to push it on Doctors in exchange for monetary compensation and in kind compensation when the US made direct monetary compensation illegal.
Purdue is a huge part of this crisis, but they shouldn't be singled out - the marketing that pharma companies engage is constantly contributing to the ill health of Americans through toxicity, unnecessary side effects, stress from financial pressures and, sometimes, direct poisoning.
Please do a bit more research into this crisis and it's causes.
1. Specifically, false qualities that Purdue actively hide evidence of.
The idea that marketing is responsible for drug addiction is delusional.
The idea that doctors are so stupid as to not know Oxy is addictive is laughably untrue.
If you want to blame anyone blame the people ordering patients to consume opiates. The lack of supervision and education is the doctor’s responsibility not the drug maker. Every doctor in the US knows Oxy is addictive and has for a very long time. Doctors overprescribe OxyContin not pharmaceutical companies.
If you want to play a blame game there is no way Purdue comes out on top. Doctors are the ones who put opiates in peoples hands https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6140023/es
I've emigrated but when I was still working in the US a co-worker of mine was given a 90 day script after an injury, which is far _far_ more than is appropriate for mild pain relief. He was a neuroscientist and enraged that a doctor would prescribe him such a stupidly dangerous quantity, he just grunted and bore it for two days then got over it.
Now, there is definitely a spectrum of responsibility/guilt that could be applied to all parties here. In some ways, the buck even stops with the patient: it's their decision what to put in their mouth and swallow, and no one was holding a gun to their head and forcing them to take the meds they were prescribed. But that of course is a very skewed view on the subject of addiction.
The crux of the issue is how society decides to assign blame. Collectively, we seem have a hard time dumping more responsibility on patients. Plenty of doctors have been fined, lost licenses, and gone to prison. Heck, my own childhood physician lost his license. But we also understand that many doctors who made mistakes deserve some leniency because they were tasked with helping people in pain.
But the drug companies...it's hard to imagine that they deserve even a shred of clemency. Their only job was to produce a product and represent it truthfully. Their failure mode was knowing, made them vast sums, and destroyed many lives.
NPR story from 2005 - https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=506167...
I think it's unfair to say that was general knowledge before 2017 or so.
They had data that it did not solve the problem but they massaged the data, and hid the data that showed it was addictive, and then later hid the data that after the drug was on the market of the ways it was being abused.
Misleading Doctors and the FDA since 1996
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/29/health/purdue-opioids-oxy...
Reporting about Reporting in 2003 - https://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/orlando-sentinel-o... (and the pressure applied by Perdue Pharma on the paper after)
2005 - https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=506167...
2007 - http://www.nbcnews.com/id/20327132/ns/health-health_care/t/p...
There is evidence that they knowingly lied to doctors and patients telling them that fentanyl was safe and less addictive than many other lesser opioids.
There is evidence that they knowingly increased pressure on sales even after it came to light that opioids were much more addictive and lethal than they thought.
There is also evidence that the sacklers were heavily involved in all of this.
I'd say yes, they definitely contributed to the epidemic in a large way.
Purdue also downplayed the addictiveness of new formulations in their advertising -to physicians-.
They also built disingenuous "self regulation" systems because they knew of the issue, and wanted to keep the wolves at bay, but the only thing the program was really designed to do was to shield Purdue. The very vast majority of over prescribing identified by this program was not reported to authorities until after the authorities had already acted (ie. when Purdue realized they would not lose any revenue from the report because the physician had already had his script writing ability pulled).
More concisely, here is a quote, directly from the article: "But the attorneys general of a majority of states, including New York and Massachusetts, are balking at the proposed deal, contending that the Sackler family has siphoned off company profits that should be used to pay for the billions of dollars in damage caused by opioids."
As someone pointed out elsewhere, a lot of this money was moved out almost a decade ago, well before there was the possibility of huge civil judgements.