> These comments, if true, lend credability that the FDA is more regulatory capture than actual useful regulation.
It lends more credibility to the fact that the FDA is notoriously underfunded when it comes to ensuring the safety of drugs[1].
It lends more credibility to the fact that the FDA is notoriously underfunded when it comes to ensuring the safety of drugs[1].
I'm of the persuasion that governmental organisations need to be shaken up from time to time to prevent ossification, stagnation, inefficiencies, regulatory capture, ideological capture, etc... but the new agency needs to utilize the pieces from the old agency (not to start from scratch).