I don't think that would be appropriate since Golang isn't (to my knowledge) under the GNU license.
Maybe gocc?
Maybe gocc?
It's a thing that exists, not a proposal.
I thought it was just spitballing an alternative name.
It's only when you want to share code with other implementations that software licensing enters the picture. Gccgo manages to share most of the standard library with the golang.org implementation, so they appear to have the licensing figured out.
So I was saying (mostly tongue-in-cheek) that it probably wouldn't be appropriate.
Sorry for the confusion, and I appreciate the clarification here too. :)