I mean... is your theory that if Apple didn’t exist, people wouldn’t buy things to look cool?
> A lot of people are intelligent and strong enough to resist this brainwash, but a lot of others are not.
Speaking of signaling status... somehow comments like this are always posted by folks who sort themselves into the first category.
Maybe people buy things you don’t want to buy just because they like them, not because they’re too dumb to resist “brainwashing.”
I mean, I can't think of a person who'd be aware enough of it and be willing to state this as a member of the second category?
One could argue a whole lot of highly valued startups are built on the premise of selling conveniences to people with far too much money and not enough sense.
You mean marketing? What company isn't doing that?
With the ability to easily swap batteries, and more efficiently written software, nobody would have to really update their phones. Which is why I guess most batteries are now integrated.
It's a terribly waste just for corporate profits and peoples vanity's sake.
A spurt of canned air followed by digging with a toothpick wrapped in cotton and damped with ethyl alcohol does magic.
Do you have AirPods ? or have you considered buying them ? I'm also on the fence about that Face ID stuff
I’m convinced that the camera quality degrades as the phone gets older/more used. What convinced me was my mom receiving a brand new 6S replacement from Apple and seeing the major camera improvement even though her broken 6S was in mint condition.
Can anyone provide some insight to this? It took years of speculation for us to learn our slower OS/battery concerns were real. I’m wondering if this is next.