Perhaps one day they will add enough cameras to make the phone flat again.
I am certainly in the latter camp, in fact, I would prefer an even thinner phone, because I am almost always within arm's reach of a charger and rarely even need "a full day" of battery life.
Are they? Almost everyone I know has a case on their phone; and I didn't have one until I bought the iPhone XS, which is over $1k and has glass on both sides.
I mean, don't get me wrong; I like the capabilities of the new iPhones. But the current design means that what most people actually use not the slick shiny slimness you see in Apple promotional materials, but thick sturdy plastic keeping all that fragile glass safe.
If Johnny Ives really wanted to be able to see people use phones the way he envisioned them, he should have designed it to withstand a 10-foot drop onto concrete. That would be a lot more useful than 30 minutes underwater.
I don't think people put cases on their phone to make them thicker. I think they use cases to increase durability. Making the phone itself thinner means that the phone in a case will also be thinner, so that's perfectly compatible with the claim that people prefer thinner phones.
2) when set on a flat surface, it creates an unstable bridge, meaning downward pressure on the phone is not supported. Think of how a piece of cardboard would react to being pressed down in the middle with only 3 of its corners supported.
3) It creates a point that can be snagged when moving the phone around, either on clothing or surfaces it's set on.
Personal opinion, it's really frustrating to have a phone that doesn't sit flat on a surface, to be unable to easily use it without some kind of case or holding it.
And if you had a thicker phone, do you think it would obviate the need for a case?
Tried to do the same with my 6S, where the glass goes over the edge of the phone. Cracked the screen 3 times, got a thin case. When I decided I wanted to upgrade to an XS rather than repair the screen again, the wife said only if you get a proper case; and I had a hard time disagreeing with her.
I'm positive that Apple could design a phone smaller than the combined size of the XS a good case, which would handle the drops I subject my phone to occasionally just fine. It would be a little thicker and less pretty than the current phone without a case, but much less thick and much less ugly than the current phone with a case.
// Technically no, technically still inset just enough to not touch the service it's on.
Serious drop test, without any wussie case
I dont know what percentage of iPhone users go case-less with their phones, but I haven't seen one being used without a case.. and I have been actively looking for them.
I say this as a person who used to go case-less with my iPhones until my iPhones started having camera bumps. Then I started to get a case to rid myself off the camera bump. Last year I got the leather case, and while I winced at the ridiculous price I paid for it, I have been extremely happy with the choice. The blend of steel, glass and leather feels and looks great.
I think these are pushing the limit of weight comfort. Bigger batteries are nice, but certainly contribute a lot to the weight.
I really liked the 158 grams of the LG V30 back when I had that.
iPhone 11 Pro is whole 188g.
Since almost everyone carries their phone in a case, it seems like a reasonable solution.
[citation needed]
Can you count how many people you know that do not use a phone case?
Anecdotal, but then so is the GP.
A) Making the camera protrusion ungainly so that most people think "I'm going to put a case on this to make it look and feel better."
B) Changing the shape of the protrusion periodically to force people to get a new case.
Therefore adding an invisible extra $40-50 profit on millions of iphones sold.
I half-joked that soon the entire back of a smartphone would surpass the "spider threshold" and eventually put a fly to shame.