Valid point - I'm a huge consumer of posts where people experiment with new solutions and share it back with the community (like the author's other blog post on how to set up static website hosting with IPFS: http://127.0.0.1:8080/ipns/withblue.ink/2019/03/20/hugo-and-... ), so I think we should generally encourage/support this sort of experimentation and documentation. But I agree the timing here is likely coincidence - the IPFS component is likely more for learning/experimentation/resiliency than specifically for the described performance gains. (Unless a large portion of users are browsing with IPFS Companion: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ipfs-companion/nib... | https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ipfs-companio...)