You misunderstand basic law terminology.
A preliminary injunction is considered very strong. So it's not that "nothing is final here", it's actually almost pretty much final unless something comes out of left field.
A preliminary injunction is considered very strong. So it's not that "nothing is final here", it's actually almost pretty much final unless something comes out of left field.
So what exactly did I misunderstand and why do you think this is final?
You are saying "the injunction was to stop LinkedIn from blocking access while [the injunction request] is ongoing".
If the court didn't think hiq had a strong case they would not have granted the initial injunction, then reaffirmed it on this appeal.
It still might be case that hiQ has less than a 50% chance of winning in the eyes of the appeals court.