For the second time in the thread you've responded to scientific studies with a single-line dismissal but no substantiation.

I provided a (brief – appropriately so for a discussion-board comment) summary and analysis of 5 different scientific studies, each of which had varying methodologies, results and conclusions.

If you're going to dispute the findings of the papers or my analysis, you need to point out where the papers or my analysis of them were flawed.

That's people do when they are interested in engaging in topics scientifically, and in good faith.