It's not intellectually dishonest. Most people know about that ruling already.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/oyez.case-media.ogg/case_data/2007/...
Consider the future. We can print these. It's only going to get better. Are you going to ban non-DRM'd printers? Printer registration and therefore confiscation?
Weapons are the ultimate form of equality. Without them the strong rule the old and weak.
It's also the easiest way to tell if you live in a class system.
Also degrees punishment or lack thereof for crimes differing by offender, is the easiest way to determine class, not whether consumers can acquire a specific class of objects.
There is nothing more fundamental than preserving life. Whether a person, independent of social class, has the same rights to defend life and property is a hard dependency. The Freedmen are discussed in the audio file I linked above.
I'm not anti gun but it's just salesmen hiding behind a noble sentiment. The only thing the NRA ever bans are generic after market add-ons which make cheap guns work like more expensive ones
A technology that reduces the profit margins of gun manufacturers, that's the quickly banned object.
People can buy what they want, whatever. The thing I actually don't like is marketers underhandedly trying to sell me things by waving a flag in my face.
Then people act like consuming a product somehow counteracts system upheaval, give me a break. Any strategic despot would get the gun owners to work for him through packing and cracking the party support and spin the tyranny as protecting liberty. Many gun owners would need very little convincing that they're "liberty defending foot soldiers". That's how this game plays out.
GOA is a better org btw.
All of the other things they serve are better handled through institutions and organizing.
The combinations of the two, organizations with guns, that becomes a much more plausible threat to peace and liberty because it affords an opportunity to exploit a power dynamic which could lead to tyranny.
Yielding to the wisdom of crowds with weapons mean that fear and threat become larger tools of society building than reflection, collaboration, listening, and creativity.
It seems like you are pro-gun ownership, I'm not sure what your point is.
If you survey history, bad things are often preceeded by a segment of the population being disarmed.