Comment by jasode | Hacker News Reader

Comment by jasode | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

>This is an unfair go at the poster. He said "I'm not arguing that npm install logs should be packed full of ads (it shouldn't)." That's clear as can be.

Please reread my reply to OP carefully and notice I did not say he endorsed NPM ads. Instead, I specifically disagreed with his suggestion to redirect the discussion away from the NPM ads to the general topic of open-source funding.

>He's asking the same question I am, how do we get sufficient funding for these projects.

To be clear, that's a different question and I wasn't even attempting to answer it. I mentioned funding like Patreon as examples of social acceptability and not as examples of income sustainability.

>Kind of defeats your point.

My point was a narrow one : others are criticizing the unwelcome ad solicitation and that's a correct area of focus.

The other question of how to get sustainable open-source funding is also an important topic -- but that doesn't mean it forbids discussion of unacceptable spam/ads. They can be 2 parallel discussions.

you said

> However, if the concrete implementation of trying to get money is unwanted and unexpected ads, then the correct focus of discussion is the criticism of that ad delivery method

But he'd already said, prior to that

> I'm not arguing that npm install logs should be packed full of ads (it shouldn't).

He'd already said no to them; you're both in agreement. There's nothing to argue about.

Having agreed that nobody wants ads, the next step is to determine how to not have them (and their nastier big sibling, telemetry and malware, which will follow) by providing funding.

(edited for brevity)

Please stop having "you said he said" discussions. If someone clarifies their position that they meant to say something else than you read, please accept it in good faith and don't see this as an invitation to hark back to their previous messages.

This comment is not aimed at you specifically, but everyone in this comment thread who engages in this pointless arguing.

You’re missing the point and illustrating it further. The comment was garbage because it derailed the entire discussion around terminal ads to try to direct it to FOSS funding.

It doesn’t matter if they both agree that text ads are bad. It’s basically a “think of the children” derailment except it’s “think of the poor foss dev”.

I think you are making an extremely valid point; i often see the same “think of the children” argument made when discussing advertising and the web. Likewise, no one is saying websites shouldn’t have an income.

If you're only talking about how you don't like the solution; and refuse to talk about the underlying problem; you're going to keep seeing the bad solution again and again and again.

Here everyone says they don't like ads; and then are shocked that people want to talk about why ads are showing up and what to do about that.

Ads show up regardless of funding. Cut the bullshit. Look at how many ads are on cable television and even pay for news websites.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com