Hacker News Reader

HN isn't censoring it. User are flagging it. Because it's off-topic.

Large community sites need never censor anything, then. For any subject even slightly controversial, there will always be at least some users flagging/reporting to justify removing it.

Wouldn't you consider selective enforcement a type of censorship?

It's not selective enforcement.

HN users get to vote what shows up on the front page. A certain ratio of votes-to-flags triggers removal. It's no more censorship than voting for a politician censors their opponent.

I guess you're right, then, if it's truly always a result of user reporting and HN never overrides that. I know that's not the case for Reddit, so kudos to HN.

Sometimes we turn off user flags but as far as I know moderators haven't touched any of these submissions.

Because people love to be hall monitors.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com