If crime is determined by victimhood:
> public intoxication not an "actual crime"
> public camping seeking shelter is not an "actual crime"
> shop lifting is an "actual crime"
> harassment is an "actual crime"
> public intoxication not an "actual crime"
> public camping seeking shelter is not an "actual crime"
> shop lifting is an "actual crime"
> harassment is an "actual crime"
Agreed on public intoxication.
A good definition of "crime" needs to be able to include action that indirectly harm a large number of potential people. Otherwise, you are powerless to address the tragedy of the commons.
If I park illegally and get towed well tough shit, if van dweller gets towed the city has violated their rights and it’s terrible. So homeless druggies get free pass to commit all sorts of low level offenses that everyone else gets crazy fines for.