It does get me wondering however, how viable this would be in other countries. Say, what if the UK or the US were to try to pull something like this. There's not much that Kazakhstan can do against Mozilla. However, if something similar were tried here in the US, it seems to me Mozilla would be a lot more vulnerable to government retaliation, or being forced to do what the Fed says whether they want to or not. The Mozilla Foundation is incorporated here in the US. Those board members whom are not US citizens could be deported or prevented from entering the US. Those board members whom are US citizens and residing here could be arrested. The IRS could be weaponized to revoke their 501(c)3 status. There's probably other things I'm not thinking of.
I'm not saying the US is quite that bad, or that it's going to get that bad here soon. But I don't think it's unreasonable to think that such could happen if people don't remain vigilant. We need only to look at the history of other nations abroad and our own history here to see just how quickly and easily it can and has gotten that bad in the past.
Again, I'm glad of Mozilla's and Google's technical solution to this problem. But, as it seems governments continue to lean in this direction, I worry that failing to pursue the policy angle in addition to the technical angle when addressing these problems will cause the technical solutions to be or become brittle.
Edit: I was reminded that donations to groups who do pursue the policy angle, like the EFF, would be more effective than handwringing on HN. I would encourage those of you whom are also concerned about this to do the same.