Your example is flawed for the following reason:
The child's right to scream ends where my right to peacefully exist in a public space begins. The child's act of screaming directly in my ear clearly violates my right and is thus intolerant of it.
The child's right to scream ends where my right to peacefully exist in a public space begins. The child's act of screaming directly in my ear clearly violates my right and is thus intolerant of it.
I believe we see scenarios today in which one's definition of peace infringes on another's.
1. I do not present any "example". I present only a fact within the parent's example.
2. None of the reasons you cite in the continuation invalidate my claims. "Accept the reality" does not erase anyone's rights.
> ... and making the parent feel even shittier than they already do ...
I do not see where I said anything remotely related to making any child's parent feel anything