e.g. "Black Lives Matter (BLM) […] campaigns against violence and systemic racism towards black people." From [1]; emphasis mine.
And let's not pretend we haven't been talking about a supposed epidemic of white cops shooting innocent black people for no reason for years and years now.
Are you starting a new, different argument, and now claiming that systemic racism doesn't exist, and that large bodies of research about it are unfounded, and supporting your claim with a single pithy statement about statistics?
If so, sorry, I don't feel like being dragged into an off-topic argument about whether the concept of systemic racism is valid.
Because the solutions are obvious but unacceptable (even to those who are discriminated against) I don't think we will make any progress on this front.
Double negatives and sarcastoc political signaling of a POV that ignores statistics in the same statement?
A successful broadcast of talking points and your agenda, but not really participation in a discussion.