Is every article focusing on a company a submarine? Maybe some events in business are just interesting and newsworthy on their own.
Spreading FUD about your competitors is a time-honored business practice. These upstart companies represent a threat to the profits of the industry giants.
But I recommend Daysoft in the UK. $8 for 32 lenses! And no prescription needed.
Meanwhile, why are you promoting Daysoft so aggressively?
Your "shady practices and user harm" quip makes you think you might be a flack. Did your firm get this article published? Good work!
My promotion of Daysoft lets you know I am not flacking for Hubble!