Even that article lists that definition as an "understandable" one and then explicitly phrases the subsequent commentary as the author's "interpretation". It seems like you're looking for a reason to be a victim of the wording used in the article.
That crosses into personal attack. Please don't do that in arguments here, regardless of how wrong someone is or it feels they are.
And could you please not post in the flamewar style to HN generally? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20473318 is an example.