What?
What?
Immigration might need a record of who you are because they're presumably trying to enforce immigration controls.
The airport doesn't need to know who you are. They are providing a building with some ancillary services like shopping and dining.
If the airport needs to have a record of you being there. What's next? Does the train to the airport need a record? What about the taxi you took to get to the train station. What about the 3 block walk you took to get to the bus stop?
> A flicker of understanding appeared momently in Little Brother's eyes as he realized that reasons Big Brother had given him for these surveillance procedures were a lie. He didn’t need this machine to carry out his stated task.
I am against facial recognition within the city, but at the airport, it is totally reasonable to have a record of who you are.
Clarifying: my post was about the private security guard before security, not Hong Kong Immigration ("customs officer") which is after security.