The same thing happened to me, only I started at 13 so I was more poorly equipped to deal with it. I learned anyway, because computers mesmerized me, and nothing that happened away from the keyboard could ever change that. Anyone capable of walking away really should, and go find their calling elsewhere, because this isn't it.
If I were interested in becoming a dancer, I would damn well become a dancer.
You can't just say it's the mens' fault. That is disingenuous and insulting to me as a male programmer.
The fundamental problem has nothing to do with men: it's that women aren't interested at all in computers. They're interested in babies, families, and things that are warm, cuddly and emotional. I'm not being sexist, I am quoting my girlfriend.
I didn't mean to insult you. I did mean to say that the aggregate behavior of many men has discouraged many women from participating in CS. That's not disingenuous, it's a fact supported by evidence.
That's pretty damning accusation you're making for programmers everywhere. Do you have citations?
1. http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/there-sexual-hara...
EDITED TO ADD: where's your citation for the "brain wiring" comment above?
"Mental rotation tasks (see this CogDaily post), which require working with a three-dimensional representation of an object, have been found to have very large sex differences favoring males"
The 3rd part of the linked article even says:
"So it appears that there are a wide variety of social factors that affect (or are affected by) sex differences in math and science. Because of limitations in the way these studies can be controlled, it's difficult to say that discrimination or differential treatment cause the sex differences we see in math and science."
Overall, the linked articles do not support the hypothesis that "men's brains are wired better".